LCSLogistics Carbon Standard
LCS / Resources / GHG Protocol revision
Regulatory briefing · Scope 3 accounting rulesRevision in progress · TWG proposals · support = per-proposal public survey

Scope 3 accounting starts asking transport to be measured.

The GHG Protocol Scope 3 standard is revising its accounting rules. It doesn’t target a single category — it reworks the whole rulebook — but several of those rules land especially hard on transport data. Below are the public proposals (Series A·B·C) and what they imply for transport (Scope 3 categories 4 and 9).

Big picture

Transport lives in categories 4 and 9.

In Scope 3, transport is upstream transport (category 4) and downstream transport (category 9). This revision reworks the accounting rules across the board — data quality (how to trust), boundary setting (how much to include), and investment redefinition — and those rules squarely target the "spend-based estimate" habit in transport.

Series A · Data quality

How do you trust an emissions figure?

The direction is to make it transparent how much spend-based estimation is mixed in.

A1Proposal support 80%

Mandatory disclosure by data type

Disclose Scope 3 emissions split by data-type grade (primary data / activity-based / spend-based). The point is to reveal how much spend-based estimation is mixed in.

A2Proposal support 87%

Mandatory verification disclosure

Verified companies must state "fully / partially / not verified". Alignment with ISO 14065 is under review.

A5·A6·A7Proposal support 80–93%

Data-quality recommendations

Use high-completeness factors (≤5% cutoff), reflect trade in regional factors, and set primary-data-ratio and improvement targets.

A8Proposal support 91%

Limit allocation of diversified suppliers’ company-wide emissions

Restrict splitting a "diversified" supplier’s company-wide emissions by spend ratio. Only homogeneous suppliers allowed; others need product/facility-level data.

Series B · Boundary

How much emissions do you include?

The direction: "it was too small to count" no longer holds.

B1Proposal support 87%

95% completeness rule

For conformance, calculate and report at least 95% of required Scope 3 emissions. Exclusions capped at 5%. Aligned with SBTi/CDP’s 5%.

B2Proposal support 87%

100% quantification to justify exclusion

To prove exclusions stay within 5%, quantitatively assess 100% of required emissions annually. Simplified methods (hotspot analysis) allowed.

B3Proposal support 98%

Clarified hotspot-analysis definition

Any calculation/estimation method may be used for hotspot analysis.

B4–B6Proposal support 86–100%

Exclusion disclosure, justification, notation

Excluding required emissions requires disclosure and justification; standard notation ("NA"/"X") introduced. A de minimis concept is introduced but kept within the 5% cap.

B7Proposal support 100%

Separate reporting of required vs optional

Report required emissions and optional emissions separately.

B11

New category 16 — facilitated activities

A category for "facilitated activities" not caught by the existing 15 — activities you neither buy/sell nor own but earn transaction revenue from (brokerage, licensing, financial services). Mostly optional (oil & gas distribution is required).

Series C · Investments (category 15)

Category 15 is narrowed to financed emissions.

Category 15 is narrowed to "financed emissions" — investments only — while other financial services such as insurance/underwriting move to category 16.

  • Clarified that category 15 applies to all companies (not only asset managers).
  • Include Scope 1·2·3 of the investee within the boundary.
  • Include debt in the denominator for share-proportional calculation (PCAF-aligned).
From transport’s seat

Four places the rules land hard on transport.

A whole-rulebook revision — yet it touches transport data especially sharply.

01

Spend-based estimation gets branded lowest-grade

A1

Many shippers handle categories 4·9 as spend-based — "we spent X on freight, times an emission factor". The proposal requires disclosure split by data-type grade, and spend-based is explicitly labeled the lowest grade. Transport emissions get publicly shown as "the item we counted most poorly".

ConsiderationSwitch from freight-spend data to activity data based on actual distance, fuel, and load to raise the grade.
02

3PLs and forwarders can’t use company-wide averages

A8

3PLs and forwarders are mostly "diversified" operators mixing many shippers and modes. Until now their company-wide emissions could be split by volume/spend ratio, but A8 restricts this. This is the key pressure point of the transport cascade.

ConsiderationShippers will now demand shipment-level, leg-level emissions data from logistics providers — who must be able to produce it or lose the deal.
03

You can’t leave transport out as "negligible"

B1·B2

Under the 95% completeness rule, even items you want to exclude must first be quantified to prove they’re within 5%. "Transport is small, so we left it out" no longer works — to exclude it you have to compute it first. For manufacturers/distributors, transport is far from negligible, so it is effectively forced in.

ConsiderationIf you have to compute it anyway, building a proper transport-data system from the start is the rational move.
04

Verification status becomes public

A2

With "fully / partially / not verified" required, unverified transport data shows up as "not verified".

ConsiderationKeep the data in a form that can pass external verification (for transport, e.g. an SFC-approved VVB).
Where LCS sits

Under this revision, measurement becomes a grade.

The revision converges on one thing — measured activity data, not spend or averages, in a verifiable form. LCS measures driving, fuel, and load at the vehicle every second with Carbon DTG, and calculates & reports to ISO 14083 with the LCS standard. Not lowest-grade spend-based, but verifiable primary data at the shipment and leg level.

Prepare ahead of the revision

Raise your transport data’s grade, starting now?

We’ll design the path from spend-based to measured primary data for your transport emissions in a 30-minute assessment.

Book a 30-min assessment →

This page summarizes public GHG Protocol Scope 3 revision proposals (Technical Working Group) and per-proposal public survey support. Final standard wording and effective dates are not confirmed; the source text prevails once in force.

GHG Protocol Scope 3 Revision Briefing — What It Means for Transport | LCS